Bangkok "acid" attack

A rather disturbing story in the Bangkok Post today: American artist Elizabeth Briel and her English husband reportedly had acid thrown over them while they were walking near the Asoke BTS stop. It appears to be a random attack.

A foreign woman artist, Elizabeth Briel, reported on Twitter on Friday that she and her husband had acid sprayed at their faces at the Asoke skytrain station last night [September 15].

She said the acid was directed at them from the stairway leading to the station near Robinson shopping mall.

Mrs Briel said her husband's eyes were damaged but would be okay, while she has a burnt scalp.

They were treated at Bumrungrad hospital.

The hospital said this is the third case they have seen lately.

Elizabeth has given a horrifying account of what happened on her blog:

Do you know how it feels to watch a loved one's eyes melt? Not metaphorically. But to watch them disintegrate. As our taxi driver kept up a bilingual patter about the fastest route to the hospital, Roy's eyes began to shed their outer membrane like jelly. It hung there like frozen tears.

"Don't rub your eyes!" I warned, but of course (he's the scientist), he knew exactly what was happening.

"It's acid or industrial cleaning fluid that caused the burns," the doctor said. "He's lost some of the conjunctiva in both eyes, but he's retained his vision. Come back tomorrow morning and see the opthamologist." He told Roy this is the third attack of this kind recently. Did the other two involve foreigners? We didn't ask. We don't really want to know.

Little else is known about the attack so its difficult to make any real judgment about this incident. Was it random? Were they targeted because they are foreign? What kind of liquid was actually used? No word yet on whether the police are going to open an investigation.

I don't recall reading a great deal about people being attacked with acid in Thailand, but in Bangladesh I saw how devastating these types of attacks can be. Perhaps reader can shed light on whether there have been similar cases to this over the years, particularly involving foreigners.

Addendum: Here's an entry that claims there is a trend of attacking women in Thailand with acid:

There is a disturbing trend that is happening in the land of Thailand. The newest form of retaliation that Thai men are using towards their ex-lovers is throwing acid onto their faces.

If you thought that your justice system was bad, then check out the judges in Thailand. In the attached video at this link, it follows the lives of two Thai women that survived acid attacks to the face.

The first lady in the video is named Jack. Her ex-husband threw acid on her face in a jealous fit of rage. She is now 100% blind and her face will be deformed for the rest of her life.

Addendum 2: Elizabeth added this on her Twitter account:

Update: My skin was irritated but I didn't get any in my eyes. After research&speaking w/opthamologist, we suspect it was alkaline not acid.

Johann Hari's "apology" is worth zilch

For two months now we've been waiting for the Independent to investigate accusations made against one of its most lauded writers: Johann Hari. Hari was accused of lifting quotes from various sources, including other people's interviews, books and so on. He was also accused of maliciously altering the Wikipedia entries of other journalists with whom he quarrelled under the alias David R. And now the results are in, well, kind of. Hari has admitted the accusations made against him were true in what could only loosely be described as an apology published by the Independent, although the findings of the investigation have been kept under wraps.

The extent of Hari's dishonesty and deception is staggering. He went after journalists who called him out and engaged in childlike games of online harassment. But this isn't some green, wet-behind-the-ears journo; this is a 32-year-old man who, among other accolades, has won the Orwell Prize, although of course that's been returned now that bloggers have ripped his stories to shreds and shown the world how deep Hari's plagiarism went.

What bugs me here is that Hari has admitted doing things that are inconceivable not just as a journalist, but as a human being and especially as a person who has a platform from which he commands respect and from which people listen to what he has to say. He is blessed to have such a platform and his irresponsibility shows the world he is undeserving of it.

Most journalists have stopped short of saying Hari should be fired and some have even suggested that his apology and admission of wrongdoing is enough to say that he has seen the error of his ways and so we should all move on. I disagree. What kind of precedent does this set? What kind of example to aspiring journalists does this provide? Hari broke every rule in the book, and a whole lot more besides, and he did it multiple times over a period of several years. And yet his punishment is four months' unpaid leave to attend a journalism training course in the USA. That is considered punishment?

Hari's apology is barely that. He has continued to make excuses about "garbled" chunks of quotes in his interviews. If he is incapable of getting coherent answers out of his subjects then he should ask better questions or ask for answers to be clarified. We've all done interviews and had answers given that were a little clunky. It's not rocket science. You sort it out without resorting to taking other people's quotes.

His apology for the Wikipedia shambles is too little too late. What he did was inexplicable. He deliberately attempted to smear the reputations of people he had had disagreements with. The only reason he has apologised is because he was finally caught out after persistently denying that David R was anything to do with him.

I don't understand why Hari has been able to keep his job at the Independent. I also don't understand why people have been rushing to his defence even after his so-called apology.

Timor-Leste's first street drag race ends in tears

Readers may remember I recently blogged about Timor-Leste's first street drag race. It appears that the event, which was held over the week, didn't go quite to plan, as reported by Timor Post on Monday:

A street drag racing tournament (involving motorbikes and cars) to commemorate the 36th Anniversary of Falintil has resulted in the severe injuring of five spectators.

The five injured during the finals of the street drag racing tournament on Sunday 4 September last were taken to the Guido Valadares National Hospital where they were treated in emergency.

The five were injured when a sedan motor vehicle “Turbo/Formula”, with the number plates JAC 1816 involved in the race was being driven by a woman named Achin Belo from Jacky Constructions collided with spectators.

The collision took place approximately 80 meters from the start line (which was in front of the PNTL police headquarters) when the driver of the vehicle lost control and crossed the left side of the road in which it was travelling mounting the curb on the university campus gate side.

The spectators were lucky in that prior to colliding with them the vehicle had already collided with a traffic sign post near the zebra crossing at the UNTL Economics Faculty gate.

Had this traffic sign post not been there, the vehicle would possibly have collided with many more spectators as well as a nearby internet café at the UNTL Economics faculty.

It's a shame really as the idea of a street drag race in Dili seems like a lot of fun.

The EDL/UAF saga

On Saturday September 3, the English Defence League (EDL) had planned to hold a march to Tower Hamlets in London. Tower Hamlets was chosen because it is strongly Muslim. I've been to a number of protests over the past 12 months, including the large gathering the EDL staged in Luton in February, and so with that in my mind I had an uneasy feeling in my stomach on Saturday morning. The march had actually been banned by the Home Office, but it was clear from monitoring EDL Facebook pages that there was still going to be some kind of "static" demo staged in London. Predictably, United Against Fascism (UAF) had called for a counter demo to be staged against the EDL.

The EDL and UAF have a history of attending each other's protests and confronting one another. I've said many times before that I don't particularly like both groups. The EDL's misguided nationalism is well documented and any valid points they may have put forward in the past have been undermined by the loutish behaviour of members across the country. There are some points of the EDL's far-Right rhetoric that do warrant discussion, but the sheer intolerance of the group's members makes it difficult to take any of them seriously. They claim to be defending Britain against the threat of Sharia law, but really all they are doing is nurturing a generation of hateful men and women.

It's easy to dislike the EDL – and with good reason – but the trouble with far-Left groups is that they are also intolerant and hateful. There was a great deal of sympathy shown for the rioters based on the oft-referred-to “bigger picture”. There were widespread calls from the Left to get to the bottom of the social context within which people took to the streets of London, Birmingham and Bristol to loot shops and wreak havoc. Let's not forget that one in four of those rioters were gang members and even more were known criminals. I've seen no calls to analyse the social context within which someone joins the EDL and spreads anti-Islamic hatred. EDL members are from working-class backgrounds and presumably face the same trials and tribulations many of the rioters do.

UAF at Whitechapel

My other reason for disliking UAF is because is because they unfairly demonise the police and attempt to provoke anyone who stands up to them. Wherever the EDL goes, UAF members will be there trying to instigate violence. They do this by confronting the EDL as they do the police. They want to spark a fight. Of course the EDL do as well, but it's important not to depict UAF as innocent bystanders in all of this and I think this extends to a lot of the far-Left.

The UAF demo

My first port of call on Saturday was the UAF demo at Whitechapel. I arrived a little after midday and caught a few of the speakers. A stage had been set up and there were several hundred people in attendance, many carrying Socialist Worker Party (SWP) signs and placards. If there's a protest going on you can be sure the SWP will be there handing out leaflets and trying to get people to sign petitions. I'm forever amazed by the sheer volume of printing those guys seem to do.

The UAF demo was lively but peaceful. The language being used by the speakers was aggressive and strong. There were calls to “crush” and “destroy” the EDL. Speakers were attempting to present the day as some kind of victory because the EDL march to Tower Hamlets had been cancelled, but this was somewhat misleading. About 10 minutes' walk up the road, police were gathering for the imminent arrival of the EDL in front of the Aldgate tube station. UAF and friends seemed content to chant to themselves in their pen and claim the moral victory.

Liverpool Street Station

There was an air of confusion and anticipation around Aldgate. I had previously seen a number of EDL members gathered at King's Cross Station and we'd been told that there were EDL at King's Cross and Liverpool Street and that they were going to be escorted to Aldgate. A sound system was being set up and all was quiet for the time being.

EDL outside Liverpool Street

A few Tweets came in about Liverpool Street and so we walked up to the station where a large group of EDL supporters was being held back from leaving the station by a line of police. The scene was chaotic. Also present were a number of anti-EDL protesters – possibly UAF, possibly not – who were screaming blue murder at the EDL. There was pure hatred on both sides.

I began taking pictures and filming only to have an anti-EDL woman palm my camera down and demand I stop filming her. I was particularly annoyed at this gesture and so I asked the angry young lady what she thought she was doing only to be mumbled at before she resumed shouting at the EDL. Slightly perturbed, I held my camera up in her direction and filmed for a couple of seconds before walking away. I was then set upon by an even angrier young woman who swore at me as if I'd just murdered her first-born. My press card was clearly visible during all of this, as it always is. It was juvenile of me to steal an extra couple of second's of footage of the initial woman, but I dislike people touching me and my equipment in such a manner.

UAF and EDL argue outside Liverpool Street

I told the second woman to calm down and that we were in a public space. She retorted that we weren't in a public space, even though we were outside of Liverpool Street Station in the middle of the day. My annoyance with all of this was for a few reasons. Firstly, at every protest I've been to I've seen members of the far-Left with cameras shoving them in people's faces, mostly the police's, and filming. If for any reason a policeman so much as gestures to push the camera away there are cries of assault and the usual spiel about being in a public space and having the right to film. Secondly, the girls who I angered were screaming and shouting in front of dozens of members of the press with video and still cameras. There was simply no way they could have avoided being filmed, not only by the media, but by CCTV. Ten minutes later those same women women were toe to toe with members of the EDL while a group of about a dozen press surrounded them.

Personal gripes aside, it didn't take long before the EDL found their way out of the station and started pouring out onto the streets. The police were caught totally off guard and the EDL and anti-EDL sides came together pretty quickly and a number of slagging matches ensued. There were a few pushes and shoves and a little posturing but ultimately I didn't see any punches thrown. The police were slow to act but did eventually start pulling people apart. And so the EDL, apparently banned from marching, marched to Aldgate.

Police prepare for the EDL

I followed the group and filmed a number of the altercations on the way, but I felt slightly anxious by the number of threats I was receiving. The EDL dislike the press. I learnt this in Luton. I knew what to epxect but it's still always unsettling to have someone threaten to smash your face in and break your equipment. One EDL member even went so far as to ask if I had a license for my camera before telling me he'd beat me up if I took any pictures of him.

Aldgate

The march made it round to Aldgate and the EDL gathered in front of a stage of their own. I really hadn't expected there to be so many of them. A number of them bought bottles of beer from an Indian restaurant, which I thught was somewhat ironic given how intolerant the EDL generally are of non-white people. This was emphasised when a number of people of Asian descent passed through the crowd only to be literally chased by the EDL. This was the only prompting the police needed to swarm in, and swarm in they did, containing and kettling the EDL. The Left has generally been vocal in its crticism of kettling – it's all about human rights, supposedly – but of course the Left works on the basis that members of the EDL have no human rights.

Police move in on the EDL at Aldgate

Tommy Robinson spoke and for a moment it looked as if all hell was going to broke loose, but the police did a stellar job and kept the EDL together. There was little else to see at this point. A few of the angry women from earlier on showed up on bicycles and tried their usual scream-and-shout tactics, but they weren't able to get close enough to really cause any agro. We took this as our cue to leave and called it a day.

Thoughts

The amount of money it costs to police anything the EDL does is astronomical, as is the amount of money it costs to keep the EDL and UAF apart. While the SWP and UAF attempted to claim Saturday as a victory for the Left, it clearly wasn't. The UAF chanted to themselves in their pen while the EDL marched defiantly through the capital city. There were 60 arrests made for violent disorder and there were a few incidents later in the evening. There was some anger that some of the EDL had been allowed to pass through Tower Hamlets on a coach and so about 200 angry Asian youths confronted the police later on. Locals were understandbly unhappy about the EDL being able to pass through their communities. The Observer's Mark Townsend Tweeted about the incident:

Mile end rd, clashes with Asian youths and police. Huge amount of riot officers. Unsavoury end to EDL demo.

Hundreds of Asian youths on Burdett Rd, riot police amassing. Police now confronting hundreds in Mile End Park. Truncheons out.

According to locals, coaches carrying EDL allowed along Whitechapel and Mile End Rd – Tower Hamlet's main artery, sparking fury.

Locals say they feel betrayed that police allegedly allowed coaches carrying EDL to travel through Tower Hamlets.

Stand off between several hundred Asian youths and police in Mile End Rd, bottles coming over. Day's tension has boiled over.

Considering the volume of angry people out of the streets on Saturday, there could have been a lot more trouble than there was. For this I think the police take the bulk of the credit. There were those on both sides who would have been happy for things to kick off. There were more than 1,000 EDL supporters out on the streets and I would have said they outnumbered the UAF crowd, but I've read there were up to 1,500 UAF supporters and friends out. I thought there were fewer. There weren't huge numbers out on the street protesting against the EDL. People maybe just don't care or else perhaps they've become wary of protests given how frequently they've been occurring under this Tory government.

I think there's some irony in the UAF/EDL saga. Without wanting to generalise too much, I look at the EDL and see working-class people with limited education taking out their frsutrations on minority groups. When I look at the UAF I see a predominantly middle-class group of educated people who have taken it upon themselves to fight a grassroots struggle. Have Laurie Penny and friends been down to Luton and spoken to people living there? Penny was at the EDL march but was unable to really offer any valuable analysis on what happened.

The EDL's message is clearly wrong and misguided, but I don't recall UAF being appointed as the country's moral guardian. I want to see EDL disbanded as much as anyone, but this doesn't mean I'm going to get behind the far-Left and join UAF protests because I see far too much hypocrisy, naivety and ignorance among those groups. UAF and their supporters are not peaceful protesters and they never have been.

In short, I think we'd be better off without the far-Left and the far-Right.

For my of my photos from Saturday visit my FlickR page. The video in this post was shot on my Flipcam and edited with Final Cut.

Taur Matan Ruak quits as commander of Timor-Leste's armed forces

Big news, although it was expected. I wrote a few weeks ago about the presidential race heating up in Timor-Leste and referenced Tempo Semanal's story about Taur Matan Ruak being ready to hang up his army boots.

The Tempo Semanal website is reporting that Ruak is ready to hang up his army boots and make a bid for president.

It appears to have happened now, as confirmed by Ed Rees on Twitter.

Well MAJGEN Taur Matan Ruak submitted his resignation letter to #Xanana and #RamosHorta today. Wow. Politics is about to change in #Timor.

I haven't seen mention of this anywhere else but Ed is a very reliable source and is good friends with Jose Belo, who will presumably have a lengthy story up on the Tempo Semanal website soon.

It begins…

Addendum: AFP now has a story. Highlights:

"Yesterday I handed my resignation letter to the president (Jose Ramos-Horta) and his excellency the prime minister (Xanana Gusmao)," Ruak told reporters in Dili.

"Because I have already served the armed forces for 36 years I think I want to go back to civilian life."

As for his presidential aspirations, Ruak said he would wait until next year to announce whether he would contest the March 2012 polls.

"I want to serve those who suffered for this nation," Ruak said.

Deputy Prime Minister Jose Luis Guterres said the government had accepted Ruak's resignation during a cabinet meeting on Friday in Dili.

"The letter has been accepted by the government," he told AFP.

Nobel prize laureate Ramos-Horta has not publicly announced he will seek re-election but Guterres said it had been "very obvious" for months that he intended to run.

Tempo Semanal also has a story:

Tempo Semanal can report that Major General Taur Matan Ruak has today confirmed that it is his intention to resign from his position as Chief of the FALINTIL-FDTL, the national defence force of Timor-Leste.

At a stand up press conference today 1610hrs Dili time 2 September 2011 General Ruak stated "today I informed the Secretary State for Defence that I have submited my resignation letter to the Prime minister and President. I have asked to resign because I have served in the Armed Forces for decades and I think its the moment for me to go back to civilian life."

The Secretary of State was unavailable for comment as he had to report in person to Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao.

In July 2011 Tempo Semanal reported that General Ruak has the intention to resign and run for President of the Republic in the 2012 elections.